COMPARATIVE OUTCOMES OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE VERSUS OPEN SURGICAL TECHNIQUES IN COMPLEX ABDOMINAL PROCEDURES

Abstract

This has transformed the scenario of the complex abdominal surgery as the proportion of minimal surgery construction and introduction of use of the artificial intelligence increases. Their practice as compared against the traditional open surgery is however heterogeneous in the results of their abilities both in terms of mass in the number of performance measures and the qualitative outcome measures of the complex abdominal surgeries. The efficiency in operation, blood loss, complication, oncologic safety of the hospital stay, learning curve dynamics, resource, and patient reported quality of life were some of the outcomes of interest. To compare the variations in inter-modalities and strength of results with the help of AI, the high-order statistical models and prediction were analyzed. The less invasive surgeries were better due to the lessening of the bloody loss, the rapidity in the post-surgery and the restriction that was at least determined as complication and the absence of any apparent difference on the oncologic margin stability and mortality. The prediction of the complexities and recovery curve of the models which were supported by AI was also masterful in the bid to develop the most preferable utilisation of the resources and learning curve optimisation. The stable positive clinical and quality-of-life outcomes of complicated abdominal surgery are attributed to minimum invasive surgery and AI-assisted surgery, that is why it should be regarded as a caring tool in terms of its implementation.